Weavers, weaving
at break of day,
Why do you weave a garment so gay? . . .
Blue as the wing of a halcyon wild,
We weave the robes of a new-born child.
Weavers, weaving at fall of night,
Why do you weave a garment so bright? . . .
Like the plumes of a peacock, purple and green,
We weave the marriage-veils of a queen.
Weavers, weaving solemn and still,
What do you weave in the moonlight chill? . . .
White as a feather and white as a cloud,
We weave a dead man's funeral shroud.
Why do you weave a garment so gay? . . .
Blue as the wing of a halcyon wild,
We weave the robes of a new-born child.
Weavers, weaving at fall of night,
Why do you weave a garment so bright? . . .
Like the plumes of a peacock, purple and green,
We weave the marriage-veils of a queen.
Weavers, weaving solemn and still,
What do you weave in the moonlight chill? . . .
White as a feather and white as a cloud,
We weave a dead man's funeral shroud.
- Indian
Weavers by Sarojini Naidu
It’s a little after 4 PM in the evening when Suguna finally
gets off the therai (loom) to make
some tea for her husband. In a few more minutes, her children will return home
from school and chaos will ensue.
“I try and finish as much as I can before they come home. At
5 PM they will go to tuitions and I will get an extra two hours to sit and work
on this saree today, before going back to cook dinner at 7 p.m.”
Her husband, Prakash casually saunters in to see who has come
to their house. As if the sight of a girl with pen, notepad and a backpack is
common at their house, he greets me with a warm “Vanakkam . . . Petti aah?” Are you here to interview us?
“Sister has come from Delhi,” Suguna informs him, as we move
out to the Veranda.
Suguna comes from a family of weavers, the Saurashtras. “My
earliest memory is of watching my naina weave
a pattu vetti. In those days we would
not be allowed to play or watch TV. I never went to school because weaving is
our family legacy, and doing or knowing anything outside it was un-imaginable
in those days.”
There is a beautiful pink saree spread out on the therai and she catches me looking at it.
“I will finish it by tomorrow. Usually, we finish a saree in
a day or two. But since it was Diwali and all these festivals came, I lagged
behind a little.”
There are two looms installed in the hall by the cooperative society they belong to.
“I find it inauspicious when either one of them is bare.”
An ink blue saree is being woven in the second loom.
“That is his work,” she tells me, pointing at her husband.
“He was supposed to finish it two days ago, but he lags behind because he has
no interest in this work anymore.”
I had imagined a weavers home to be a chaos of threads and
needles, but it was quite the opposite. There were no wisps of silk threads
peeking out from anywhere near the loom. Nothing was wasted. There was complete
order and a method to the hall I was standing in, a contrast to the lives of
the weavers themselves.
“This is a simple silk saree without much zari work.” Prakash tells me. “When we
get orders for heavy work and intricate designs, it takes at least ten to
fifteen days to complete a Kanchipuram pattu
podavai (silk saree). For that, we will get paid more, about four to five
thousand per piece. The simpler the design, the lesser money we get.”
I ask him if there is a minimum wage which is fixed by the
government.
“For those of us who work under Silk cooperatives in
Kanchipuram, there is a fixed rate for every design.”
For a town that is known for its rich cultural heritage,
beautiful temples and the production of kanchi
silk, Kanchipuram and its market are extremely unremarkable at first glance.
At least until you travel about five to ten kilometers out of town and catch sight
of the nesavalar (weaver) colonies.
My earliest memories of Kanchipuram are the ones I inherited from my
grandfather.
“The streets would sing the song of looms, tak-tak-tak-tak, and the kovil mani (temple bells) would
occasionally flow with the rhythm of the weaver’s instrument during evenings.”
These songs can no longer be heard as I walk into the weaver colonies- clusters
of homes built by different cooperative societies. “The few looms which can
still be heard sound tired and somewhat anachronistic. Many of the weavers have
put away their loom frames; they either work as landless labourers during
agricultural seasons or they eke out a living as rickshaw pullers.”(1)
The political affiliation of weavers in Kanchipuram is glaringly evident from the two leaves painted at the entrance of most houses - the AIADMK symbol. It prompts a memory of former Tamil Nadu CM J. Jayalalitha clad in bright red kanchi silk sari during the controversial and even more extravagant wedding of her then foster son, Sudakaran in 1995. A photograph of Jayalalitha and her close aid Sasikala Natarajan posing together, draped in red and gold, circulated countrywide in all national newspapers, as the public condemnation of the undisguised misuse of official machinery and ‘public money’ reached a new high. The six yards that in many ways defined her life, career and public persona, simultaneously marked the declining generation of weavers and artisans in Tamil Nadu- “Tarikuzhi alla, chavu kuzhi” (It is the grave pit, not the loom pit.)(2)
In the main market, called Gandhi Road,
one can see cooperative societies housed one next to the other. Created in
order to protect the weavers from private entities and industrial production of
sarees, these cooperatives provide housing and employment to the weaver. On the outskirts of the town, one can
see various colonies, housing both the members and weavers of respective
cooperative societies.
No society is independent of any political affiliation.
Their very names indicate which party they identify themselves with - Dr
Kalaignar Karunanidhi Silk Co-op Society, Arignar Anna Silk Handloom Weavers
Co-op, Murugan Silk Handloom Weavers, etc.
Suguna and her husband work for Arignar Anna Silk Co-op which was established in 1971. “The cooperatives are the reason why we are
still surviving. Some days when the design goes wrong and a thread is missed,
an entire saree gets wasted. Then our three-day labor is gone. I have begun to
cook at weddings to manage our household nowadays”
Unlike Prakash, Suguna appears to have a more positive
outlook towards her profession. “In our community, a weaver is married off to a
weaver only. What will I or he do with an educated partner, when weaving a
saree requires at least two people? I was married off to him as a companion,
not just for life but for work as well.”
Narratives of ‘community’ and weaving as a familial
tradition indicate that the division of labor is largely based on age and
gender. Nalli Kuppusaimi indicates the change in this division of labor, as
production is no longer owned by weavers themselves. “Kuppusami recalls with nostalgia the early 1920s and 1930s
when there was a one-to-one equation between the production of the silk saree
and the buyer.”(3)
Women largely remain invisible in these narratives, merely performing the function of labor which is exchanged between their native home and to their
husbands’.
I tell her how my
family had brought several silk sarees for a family wedding, which were sold to
us as Kanchi silk but no one knew how
they were produced.
“He thinks our handwork has no value anymore. Like you just
said, who will know whether the saree was hand-woven for days or machine
produced within hours? My husband has lost hope in this profession. He laments
not knowing any other skill.” As for her, she is content with life as it is.
“One cannot do this work if there is no interest.” She points towards her hall-
‘Idhu dhan vazkhai’ (this is all
there is to life.)
The alienation that these weavers endure today has a history
going far back to the 17th century when the East India Company
established its presence in Madras. During the period of colonial rule in
Madras, the weavers were pushed out of their villages to the newly created
Black Town areas - a practice which
continues today, with the weavers continuing to live in the outskirts of
Kanchipuram.
The weavers who lived in the Black Town came directly under the
control of the British administration and all cotton or silk was the property
of the Company. The mode of production, which had been one of weaver-buyer had
now transformed into one of master-weaver under the new capitalist endeavor
brought by the colonial masters. In an account from Salem district records
during the 19th century, “the weavers were saddled with the loom
tax, house tax, sayar tax (tax on
dyes) chappadalali or stamp duty.”(4) In the course of three
centuries from the 17th to the 19th century, the role of
the master changed from a representative of the weaver to an agent of the
Company.
The position of the master as a tyrannical figure continued
well into the twentieth century, and the deplorable conditions of the weavers
whose suffering began with the withdrawal of royal patronage in the
pre-colonial era deteriorated further. It was with the establishment of
cooperative weaver societies in the post-independence era, and new textile laws
laid down by the government, that a new form of collective emerged, which
provided a form of economic and social security to the weavers.
The president of Anna silk co-op, Mr. Dayalan Chettian takes
me through the dying area inside their office. Unlike Suguna, who is a small-time weaver, Chettian comes from the family of Mudaliyars (cotton weavers). In
a very matter of fact manner, he tells me “all industries have a downfall at
some point. The price of gold has gone up by so much and yet the kanchi silk and its weavers have had no
improvement in their lives. The increasing urge in the market is to capitalize
on ethnicity and sell ‘culture’.” Lounging outside his home in an easy-chair,
he sips on tea and casually murmurs “They are all (weavers) stuck in a trap in
which penury and excellence go hand in hand.”
New methods of production under the capitalist economy
resulted in a change in power relations and methods of manufacture. Kanchipuram
may be the center of silk woven sarees, but most of the raw material is from
elsewhere, indicating an intricate and lengthy process of production. The raw
silk is procured from Hosur, Dharmapuri and Bangalore areas, where the Mulberry
worm is cultivated. It is then procured by the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Silk Producers
Federation (TANSILK), from which the cooperative societies buy silk and
distribute it among the weavers. The bundle of silk procured from
TANSILK is raw and rough to the touch before it is given to the dyers. The
twisted silk (ready silk) is “dyed according to market preferences; for example, this was a month of festival so we mostly made pink and red sarees.” Chettian
points at racks of red and pink silk left to dry in the shed outside his home.
However, the process isn’t over yet. The golden Zari is
separately produced in Surat. In original Kanchi
sarees “zari was always made of
silver thread coated in pure gold. The heavier the saree meant the more the
gold in it.”
At present, Surat is the largest producer of golden border
zari. However, since the production in Surat is privatized, the government once
again steps in to provide assistance. “The zari is naturally expensive and when
you leave it on Private hands the costs are usually sky-high. That is why we
have the Tamil Nadu Zari Ltd. right here in Kanchipuram.” A government of Tamil
Nadu undertaking, it was established in 1971 “to provide protection to the silk handloom
weavers’ cooperative societies in the State engaged in the weaving of silk by
making available the required quality of zari at the reasonable rates to save
them from stiff competitions of the monopoly of the zari merchants in and
outside of the State.”(5) (TNZL, official site)
Each cooperative has a rule
book. At the Kanchipuram Murugan Silk Handloom Weavers Society, I chance
upon one. It is impressive how detailed rules for the coolie (waged labor) are. The government, in order to protect the
weavers from exploitation, had laid down the exact wage for the designs being
commissioned. But these rates have barely changed in the past two decades,
laments Raja, a weaver and part-time peon in the cooperative office.
Raja also comes from a family of Sourashtras, a community of Gujarati silk weavers who had migrated
to the Tamil country during the rule of Krishna Deva Raya of the Vijayanagar Empire
in 14th century. Largely concentrated in Madurai, some of them are
scattered across Tamil Nadu today due to demands of labor. Raja’s family is
also a generation of weavers who were based in Coimbatore. “I don’t remember
much as I grew up in Kanchipuram, but I have heard stories of my family legacy,
of how the king was their patron, once upon a time.”
I ask Raja if there is a difference in designing and making of
a saree, based on each community.
“No nothing like that. Who are we to design things? It is
the mudalali (owner) who tells us
what he wants based on the latest fashion”
He and Suguna’s husband Prakash share similar sentiments.
“Back in the day, about ten to fifteen years ago, the cost
of one gram silver was 10 rupees. Gold was about a thousand rupees per gram. Nor
everyone could own a silk saree, not then and not even now.
Today, with
inflation and the added cost of our coolie
(wages) the silk saree costs no less than few lakh rupees. The simplest one
will be worth at least fifteen thousand rupees.”
I quickly interrupt him to point out how even today silk
sarees are the main attraction at all events and festivals in our culture. “How
many times have you gone to purchase a silk saree and checked if they were
machine made or handwoven; if the zari was truly gold or synthetic? When these
retail shop keepers throw so many colorful sarees in front of you, one forgets
what is original and what is not. You won’t know the difference. “
The Ministry of Textile had listed 22 varieties of designs
solely under the monopoly of weavers, in order to keep their work in demand.
However, in 1991, 22 designs were reduced to 11 and the remaining was shared
with industrial manufacturers. At present, the nesavalar is left with only about five or six designs. The
traditional designs which could only be woven in handlooms were replaced by
computer designed patterns that could be easily created at half the cost on
power looms. In 1998, the textile policy (not changed) released by the Tamil
Nadu government stated: “Due to low-value addition, low productivity and
increasing costs of raw materials and labour, handloom fabrics have
traditionally suffered a cost handicap in the market compared to similar
products produced by power looms . . . Therefore to offset this inherent
handicap, subsidies have traditionally been given to the handloom sector . . .
It is estimated that the annual subsidy in Tamil Nadu is of the order of Rs 70
crores. Despite such support, the economic condition of the weavers producing
low-value fabrics has not improved. In fact, as noted earlier, there continues
to be steady attrition in the number of handloom weavers.”(6)
“A weaver takes fifteen days to produce a minimum of three
sarees, but the machine takes one day to produce about five sarees. If my
labor is worth two thousand rupees, then the man working at machines gets only
three hundred rupees. Now you tell me if given a choice, what mode of
production will you choose for good profit?” Raja asks me.
The cooperatives societies are also mostly community-specific according to him. “I am sure you must have heard about and even seen
the massive Nalli showroom on your
way here. Like your Sharma’s and Sastri’s in north, Nalli is the name of a community of weavers (Chettiars). Like a trademark, anybody belonging to their community
attaches Nalli in front of their
name. Nalli Chinnasami Chettiar would sell hand-woven sarees from door to door
in Madras during the 1920s. His son Nalli
Kuppusami Chettiar mobilized their community people and started the
business of sarees; now look at them, there is not a single person in the
weaving community who does not envy the Nalli
people. Nalli is what it is today
because of their strong community and camaraderie between them.”
While they feel helpless about their current situation,
there is still hope for their children. “I want my daughter to become a
teacher. Let this life of hardship end with us.” Suguna tells us.
My aunt strongly objects to this. “But what about our
culture? Please teach your children this wonderful art, namma kalacharam (the essence of our tradition).”
“And who will save them from this poverty?”
Mr. Chettian points to the homes clustered around one
another. “Unlike their parents, the children should know they have a choice, a
better future.”
----------X--------
I have spent the better part of my life watching women drape
the nine-yard wonder that is the Kanchipuram
saree and I have seen it passed on from one generation to the next as an
inheritance exclusively among women. What I never saw, or even wondered about
was the worn hands of the nesavalar, whose
life, in its entirety, revolved around the white and golden threads of
silk.
A memory that will always stay with me is of watching Suguna
take out one skirt after another, all in colorful hues. “I can never weave a
saree for myself. I don’t think any weaver can weave for himself. It just does
not feel right. But for my daughter, I have made many, many things.”
“Do you make them from leftover threads?” I ask her.
“No, no. There is no such thing as leftovers. Every single
thread of silk is counted and aligned in a saree. I save money every few months
and ask mudalali (owner) to give me
whatever comes of it. That is why they are all colorful. I just stitch
whatever color I get.”
“If you stay here a few more days, we will weave you a saree
as well. Take it as a token of a gift from namma
ooru (our town) Kanchipuram” she offers. “Yellow is your color, I can
already tell.”


Comments
Post a Comment